<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Technical-Founders on Evgeny Ramenskiy</title>
		<link>https://ramenskiy.com/tags/technical-founders/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Technical-Founders on Evgeny Ramenskiy</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
			<copyright>&lt;a href=&#34;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;CC BY-NC 4.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright>
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://ramenskiy.com/tags/technical-founders/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Why Technical Founders Matter (Especially in Europe)</title>
				<link>https://ramenskiy.com/posts/posts/why-technical-founders-matter-especially-in-europe/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://ramenskiy.com/posts/posts/why-technical-founders-matter-especially-in-europe/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;The case for technical founders comes down to operations. When the product &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the company, you win by reducing variance in decisions and delivery. That requires someone who can translate messy reality into working systems quickly and credibly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Europe, in particular, has a stake in this. The region has world-class research and engineering talent, but a smaller share of scaled tech companies than the U.S. or China. Multiple analyses now argue that &lt;em&gt;who&lt;/em&gt; starts the company, especially whether they’re technical, shapes that outcome. (&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.wsj.com/tech/europe-big-tech-ai-1f3f862c&#34;&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.ft.com/content/47d28f39-6f9d-4c46-9e36-c45a9f398a62&#34;&gt;Financial Times&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
